NCAA Basketball. For some, it is almost a religion. For others, an amusing pastime to give them something to think about during the third month of the year. Either way, it is fun to follow. I have always found the concept of a single elimination tournament to be somewhat biased though. The way to choose a champion is not to say: "Hey, lets throw 64 teams into a big single elimination tournament and give a big trophy to the one team that doesn't lose once." That is merely a good way to choose a lucky team. Such a system does not play well for number 1 cede Pittsburgh, who was defeated by Butler today. For the NCAA to truly honor the best teams in college basketball, they should hold a tournament that allows the teams to truly prove themselves on the court. This could be through a double elimination tournament, or it could be in a fashion similar to the NBA, with multiple games to determine a winner per round. Either way could prove difficult to implement, but both would provide a more clear standing of who the best teams are. Both would be more fair than polls or a single elimination tournament.
Thoughts?
No comments:
Post a Comment